The Creator-Creation Distinction in the Thought of Cornelius Van Til as an Apologetic Critique of Dataism

Authors

  • Novallick Justin Sundamen Elungan Fakultas Teologi, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon
  • Henny William Booth Sumakul Fakultas Teologi, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59002/jtp.v6i1.221

Keywords:

Dataism, Creator-creatur distinction, Cornelius Van Til, apologetics, data religion

Abstract

Dataism, as popularized by Yuval Noah Harari, views all of reality - including human beings - as a data-processing system, thereby elevating the flow of data to the highest value that determines meaning, decisions, and truth, and thus emerges as an alternative religion in the contemporary era. This article examines the ontological and epistemological claims of Dataism through the framework of Cornelius Van Til’s Creator-creation distinction. This study employs a qualitative-descriptive literature review design with thematic text analysis, mapping Dataism into four hierarchical layers of claims: empirical (the capacity of algorithms to process data), anthropological (the reduction of humans to biochemical algorithms), epistemological (data as the authority of knowledge), and axiological (the flow of data as the highest value). The results show that Van Til’s distinction affirms the empirical reliability of algorithms but reveals a fundamental error in the subsequent three layers, as Dataism repeats an ancient rebellion—namely, the creation’s desire to usurp the Creator’s throne, now with data as its crown. This study concludes that the Creator-creation distinction serves as a powerful yet focused presuppositional critique, affirming the status of data as a derivative and dependent creation, not an absolute source of truth.

References

Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394

Afiyanti, Y. (2014). PENGGUNAAN LITERATUR DALAM PENELITIAN KUALITATIF. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v9i1.157

Al-Kassimi, K. (2023). A Postmodern (Singularity) Future with a Post-Human Godless Algorithm: Trans-Humanism, Artificial Intelligence, and Dataism. Religions, 14(8), 1049. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081049

Andre Febrianto, Rusdy A Siroj, & Hartatiana. (2024). Studi Literatur: Landasan Dalam Memilih Metode Penelitian Yang Tepat. Journal Educational Research and Development | E-ISSN : 3063-9158, 1(2), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.62379/jerd.v1i2.142

Antolínez Uribe, D. (2023). A new religion for the 21st century: An interpretation of ‘dataism’ from the sociology of pierre bourdieu. The Journal of Psychology & Sociology, 85(2). https://doi.org/10.26577/JPsS.2023.v85.i2.012

Bahnsen, G. L. (1998). Van Til’s apologetic: Readings and analysis. P&R Pub.

Bentz, J. C. (2025). Homo Deus as Utopian Myth: Yuval Noah Harari’s Transhumanism Contested. Journal of Religion, Culture & Democracy. https://doi.org/10.54669/001c.129465

Erdocia, I., Migge, B., & Schneider, B. (2024). Language is not a data set—Why overcoming ideologies of dataism is more important than ever in the age of AI. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 28(5), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12680

Frame, J. M. (1995). Cornelius van Til: An analysis of his thought. P & R Publ.

Hạnh, N. V. (2026). From Big Data to Dataism: Philosophical Reflections on Freedom, Labor, and Biological Inequality from a Historical Materialist Perspective. Philosophy and Realistic Reflection, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v3i2.1138

Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. HarperCollins Publishers.

Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 lessons for the 21st century (First edition). Spiegel & Grau.

Klooster, M. (2023). GPT-4, Dataism, and Presuppositional Apologetics A Van Tillian Analysis of the Presuppositions That Underly GPT-4 and Dataism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389314525_GPT-4_Dataism_and_Presuppositional_Apologetics_A_Van_Tillian_Analysis_of_the_Presuppositions_That_Underly_GPT-4_and_Dataism

Kobelieva, D. L., & Nikolaienko, N. M. (2021). From Information Search to the Loss of Personality: The Phenomenon of Dataism. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (20), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i20.249591

Mumu, A. S. (2024). Membangun Pemahaman Doktrin Dengan Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence Pada Pemuda Gmim Imanuel Toraget Wilayah Langowan Dua [Skripsi]. Fakultas Teologi, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tompohon.

Natalia, S. R. (2025). Dataisme: Ideologi Baru Menantang Imago Dei di Era Post-Truth. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teologi, 1(1), 173–186.

Nidzom, M. F., & Syam, F. F. (2025). Problem Relativisme Kebenaran di Era Post-Truth: Tinjauan Epistemologis. JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan, 11(1), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.24235/jy.v11i1.19497

Oliphint, K. S. (2013). Covenantal apologetics: Principles and practice in defense of our faith. Crossway.

Stevanus, K., & Mauclau, I. A. (2021). Apologetika Presuposisi Triperspektivalisme Cornelius Van Til Terhadap Agnostisisme. SANCTUM DOMINE: JURNAL TEOLOGI, 11(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.46495/sdjt.v11i1.114

Syllaidopoulos, I. (2023). Dataism: The Rise of a Data-Driven World? A Guide for Data-Oriented Policy and Management. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 06(03), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i3-16

Telaumbanua, A. A. S., & Pasaribu, T. (2026). Ilusi Keilahian: Analisis Kritis Gagasan Homo Deus Melalui Lensa Imago Dei Dalam Kejadian 1:26-27. LAMPO: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 2(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.63832/59at2z83

The Korean Society of Minjung Theology, & Kim, H. Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism, and the Crisis of Theo-logos: Toward Theo-dao. The Korean Society of Minjung theology, 38, 103–127. https://doi.org/10.58302/madang.2022..38.103

Van Til, C. (1969). A Christian theory of knowledge. Presbyterian & Reformed Publ. Co.

Van Til, C. (2003). Christian apologetics (W. Edgar, Ed.; 2nd ed). P&R Pub.

Van Til, C. (2007). An introduction to systematic theology: Prolegomena and the doctrines of revelation, scripture, and God (W. Edgar, Ed.; 2. Aufl). P&R Pub.

Van Til, C. (2008). The defense of the faith (K. S. Oliphint, Ed.; 4th ed). P & R Pub.

Published

31-08-2026

How to Cite

Sundamen Elungan, N. J., & Sumakul, H. W. B. (2026). The Creator-Creation Distinction in the Thought of Cornelius Van Til as an Apologetic Critique of Dataism. Jurnal Teologi Pambelum, 6(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.59002/jtp.v6i1.221

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.